Wednesday, October 03, 2007

An answer to this sloggers infrequent prayers

Church Unveils "Slow-Track" Program - By Amy Chamberlain

SALT LAKE CITY

In order to better meet the needs of "our most average members," church representative Howard S. Jeppeson announced the creation of a new slow-track membership program. "This program caters to those members of the church who may not be top-level celestial material but who are still willing to put in a nominal effort toward their own salvation," he said.

The slow-track program includes the same components of normal church membership, but at a more relaxed pace. Members who sign on for the program are required to read scriptures and have personal and family prayer once a week, attend church once a month, visit teach or home teach four times a year, and watch one session of general conference every other year. If slow-track members can commit to these requirements for five years, they can earn a temple recommend stamped with an S for "slow track," after which they are expected to attend the temple semiannually. According to Jeppeson, the church may create a shorter, condensed version of the temple ceremony for S-track members "in order to better accommodate those members' shorter attention spans and lower levels of ambition."

Social historian Jane Schippen, PhD, a long-time scholarly observer of Mormon society, hails the new slow-track program. "Mormonism pays a great deal of attention to its high achievers, like those who are stake president before they turn forty or women who have eight children and maintain a spotless house," she observed. Similarly, she continued, "Mormons spend a lot of time and energy worrying about those on the other end of the spectrum, the less-actives." She sees the slow-track program as "a way to acknowledge and honor the vast majority of Mormons, those who will never hold high positions of leadership but who are nevertheless active - the sloggers, if you will."

Logan Stake president Gary L. Hackett agrees with Schippen and says that the new slow-track program "will prod the lazy ones into progressing at least a little bit, which is an improvement." He estimates that implementing the slow track will cut administrative tasks, such as nagging phone calls to complete home or visiting teaching, by as much as 75 percent. "It's about time we recognized that not everyone in the church is that top ten percent of the celestial kingdom material," he notes. "And, really, that's okay. I mean, the bottom two levels of the celestial kingdom are supposed to be pretty good too, right?"

Most members seem happy with the soon-to-be-implemented system. "Let's face it," says local member Larry K. Whiting. "I'm not cut out for this high-paced, pressure-oriented Mormon lifestyle. I mean, home teaching four families every month? The scheduling alone takes way too much time. And then I have to go over there and pretend I care about these people when I'd rather be home watching ESPN? Give me the slow-track program any day."

Local member Kendra Koenig agrees. "Do you know how much fun it is trying to roust five kids out of bed for family scripture study and prayer at 6:30A.M.? I am sick to death of nagging them about it, and you can believe it's not doing our family harmony any good." She praised the slow-track system for offering a more realistic temple-attendance schedule. "Like anyone who has a life can manage to get out there twice a month? This slow-track program is the answer to my infrequent prayers."

Thursday, August 30, 2007

The Open Pulpit: Blessing or Curse?

By: Ronan - September 13, 2005

There is one indisputable fact about Mormonism, something that not even those pesky Signature Books-types can call into question, something so true that no FAIR-defense can deny:

Mormons say CRAZY things from the pulpit.

Everyone knows this. Missionaries sweat about bringing investigators to Sacrament meeting ("I do hope the talks aren’t CRAZY"). Fast and Testimony meeting is worse ("will Brother CRAZY get up?") My ward, in an effort to get people to bring their friends to church, has set a date where specially selected non-CRAZY people will talk.

I’m sure everyone has their favourite bizarre sacrament meeting moment. Mine is of a brother in England who demonstrated that "evolution can’t be true as humans and monkeys have one crucial difference: humans have sex face to face."

Cue sinking into the pew agony.

For a missionary church, so bothered about PR, it’s a wonder we have an open pulpit policy where anything goes. Some of us intellectual snobs crave a well-honed homily from a multi-degreed priest. To allow Sister DeWalt to drawl on about wringing the necks of chickens with a prayer in her heart is a crime. IT’S A CRIME!

But here’s the truth: I have long thought that the Mormon open pulpit is both our curse and our blessing. Once in a while, something so heart-felt, so uncontrived graces the pulpit, that it is worth a decade of craziness. In the household of God, all are equal. Even the weird ones who say CRAZY stuff. There’s a wonderful practicality to all this too: I have absolutely no fear of public speaking, something I ascribe in large part to having given my first talk when I was 9. I talked about Elijah and the priests of Baal. I don’t think it was crazy.

In the end, madness I can forgive. Just don’t bore me.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Tragic Event Forces Man To Spend Rest Of Life Confined To Office Chair

SALT LAKE CITY, UT—The life of college graduate Ben Larsen was forever changed earlier this decade when the once outgoing and carefree student succumbed to a job offer at a local CPA firm, an unforeseen and tragic event that will most likely keep him confined to an office chair for the rest of his life.

While he can sometimes rise from his office chair under his own power, Larsen said he can only do so with "great difficulty."

While many details remain unclear, it is now believed that Larsen lost any and all upward mobility moments after being hired for an auditing position at Hansen, Barnett & Maxwell in January 2003. According to several eyewitnesses at the scene, the impact of Larsen's full-time employment was so sudden and crushing that it has left the former active young man paralyzed in front of his work computer screen ever since.

"You hear stories about it all the time, but you never think that something like this is going to happen to you," said Larsen, who now spends most days trapped inside a windowless cubicle, and only leaves his office chair in order to use the bathroom. "It's funny: One minute you have your entire future ahead of you, and the next thing you know, you practically need someone to drag you out of bed in the morning."

Due to Larsen's condition, simple, everyday tasks such as grocery shopping, walking his dog, or even just cleaning up after himself have become virtually impossible feats. In addition, Larsen admitted that he has been forced to abandon a number of his favorite activities, from hiking, rock climbing to just kicking his feet up and playing nerdy role playing games.

Larsen, who claims to have lost "all sense of purpose" due to this harrowing turn of events, is already finding it difficult to remember a time when he "didn't feel completely numb."

"People keep telling me that it's going to get easier, that I won't always be stuck in this position, but right now, every minute of every day is a struggle," Larsen said.

In recent weeks, Larsen has also found himself requiring the aid of various stimulants and drugs, such as caffeine, sugar, and even Diet Rock Star, just to get through the day. Worse yet, those close to the once lively 36-year-old report that he has become almost entirely dependent on computers to communicate with those around him.

"I realize that what happened to Ben is nobody's fault, but still I sometimes wish I could have my old buddy back," said longtime friend Menges, who recently visited Ben in his cubicle. "At first I tried pretending like nothing had changed, but every time I looked at him all I could see was that…that chair."

News of Larsen's debilitating employment has left his loved ones shocked and feeling helpless.

"Ben had such a bright future—he could have gone on to do anything he wanted," said CJ Larsen, who claimed that he almost didn't recognize his brother. "To see him like this now, in that button-down dress shirt and those pleated slacks, it's almost too much to bear."

"He didn't deserve this," he added. "Nobody deserves this."

While Larsen has often thought about quitting for good, one thing has kept him going through it all.

"Sometimes I imagine what a relief it would be if I just gave up all together, if I never had to deal with another weekday ever again," Larsen said. "But then I think about my school loans, mortgage and my credit card debt, and I know I have no choice but to keep going."

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Gidian Speaks Out


Clearly, a mistake has been made. For whatever reason, I have been singled out and wrongly characterized by the adult world as a "real handful." In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.

I concede that I am something of a live wire. Given to the occasional outburst of what might in all fairness be called hyperactivity, especially in cases involving high sugar intake—of course. But the "handful" classification is problematic at best, a gross exaggeration at worst.

Am I a child who is sometimes difficult? Yes. Am I a difficult child? No. The distinction is more than semantic.

Once you get a reputation for being a handful, everything you do is automatically cast in a negative light. Suspicious glances meet you every time you even think about touching the TV, and God forbid you come within five feet of a computer. You have, in effect, already been accused, tried, and sentenced for actions you have not even taken. From then on, anything you do is retroactively construed as "problem behavior."

Knowingly or unknowingly, adults create a set of expectations that a 4-year-old like me can't help but internalize on some level. After enough humiliating time-outs, those who are treated as handfuls start thinking of themselves as such.

Admittedly, my attention span is short, and at times I am easily distracted by colorful and/or Disney-shaped stimuli in my immediate environment. But I cannot stress enough the importance of early-childhood self-image formation. (I believe Thomas the Tank Engine has explored this subject in some detail—I'd cite the specific episode but unfortunately I don't have it in front of me at the moment.)

A label like "handful"—nothing more than a social construct—can take years to shake off. It could very well haunt me until I'm 6, even 7 years old. And by that time, it probably will have led to something even worse. Today it may be "handful," but how long before you are being called a wisenheimer, or even worse, a Buster Brown?

Now, allow me to preempt a predictable yet fallacious argument from my detractors: that by complaining, I am being a big crybaby-face. I understand the impulse to render my argument moot by resorting to ad hominem attacks, but again, it is an unfair assessment of my character. I have never been one to engage in manipulative grandstanding, and I have no patience for those who use whining, balled-up fists, or stomping on the floor as measures by which to flout adult authority. On the contrary, I stand by my previous assertion that I have a legitimate grievance to air, and, while my tummy does indeed ache, this is a much more serious ill.

It is the "terrible twos" all over again. A whole year boiled down to being "terrible," despite many notable achievements during those 12 months. I made huge strides in shape recognition and speech acquisition. Plus, need I remind you, I learned to walk while carrying a stuffed animal in my hands.

Further evidence of selective memory on the subject of my conduct can be seen in the failure to recognize and praise my more recent achievements. I've managed to start putting away my blocks more than 50 percent of the time. I can almost tie my shoes; true, I cannot loop yet, but have perfected the first phase. Plus, I can now button my shirt. And yet, in that specific instance, more attention was paid to the fact that I might not have gotten my shirttails exactly even than to the fact that I had made a breakthrough in the much more challenging arena of button-fastening.

Not unlike the proverbial infant strapped into a bouncy-bouncy chair, I am at the mercy of the adult world's judgment, a world in which any protest on my part is met with the suggestion that maybe somebody needs a nap. As if a few minutes of lie-down sleepy-time could even begin to solve a problem this systemic and pervasive!

How so-called "grown-ups" could resort to such base stereotyping in their supposedly advanced thinking is beyond my comprehension. So I beg you, as mature big people, to reconsider this damaging opinion which has caused far too much pain already. Thank you, bye-bye, and have a good day. Editorial all gone!

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

China III

We woke up early and got to the airport with little problems. We found the security in China to be a lot quicker and nicer. I had a 20oz bottle of Coke Lite and instead of throwing it away, she merely opened it, took a sniff and handed back when she was sure it was an explosive chemical compound.

We were met by a dimunitive girl named Shopia who was holding a sign with our names. The island paradise of Hainan was awesome. The warm humidity hit us like a wall when we got off the plane. The natives were at the gate with flower leis, like Hawaii.

Everything is green and the people are pretty rural for the most part. Lots of farms, lifestock and old buildings. Despite it being a popular destination spot, it is an economic recovering area due to extreme poverty. Hainan is also known for having the worst record for aborting female fetuses. The birth ratio is 118 boys to 100 girls. There are going to be a lot of lonely boys in China in the years to come.

We were taken to a resort for the first night as a welcome gift. We were right on the coast in a nice resort and spa. We soaked in a large hot pool in this weird building. Actually there were several pools with different temperatures and one with little fish that would eat the dead skin off your feet. Yes, you heard me. Little fish. Millions of them. They really tore into our feet for a while and then moved up knees and elbows and one took a bit off my nip. Not a fun event.

After the spa, we went to a nice, 15 course meal. the web isn't working i'll post more later

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

online chat with B' about Mom, Dad and childhood

Mook: she used jello powder in a bottle for Adam
B: ?
for juice?
Mook: yeah
ha
B: goodness
Mook: lucky bastard
i was always jealous :P
i used to love jello
when Nick and I would drive around with my dad, invariably we would be in the back of the pickup, and everytime the brake lights would come on, we would pretend the red ground was red jello and act like we were eating it
Sent at 11:46 AM on Wednesday
B: ha
that is really cute!
Mook: I probably logged about 5,000 miles in the back of that truck. We drove everywhere in the back. Everytime we went backpacking
B: yikes
yeah
I probably logged that many hours on the floor of the cadi
Mook: On dirt roads, Andy would stand up with his arms accross the cab and hold on to each window and nick and I would hold on to his arms. It was fun to go around corners like that. my favorite part is when he would sing Ted Nugent songs to us.
B: ha
britany spears would like to raise her kids with you!
good lord what was your dad thinking?!?!
I can see sitting in back...sort of

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

China pt. 2: Beijing and the Great Wall

Ok, so I left you as we finished our first full day in China with an exciting visit to the Forbidden City.

The rest of the week was pretty uneventful. We worked all day, ate lunch at the community cafeteria in the tech center where our client was located. We were on the very edge of Beijing. Beijing is organized with what is called the "ring roads". Basically, as the city has grown over the centuries, they add a road that circumscribes the city. It takes about 50 minutes to drive from the center to the 5th ring road, where we were.

We were even farther out than that. We had open fields where we were... and lots of cranes and new buildings going up everywhere. We did have a Subway Sandwhich place near our hotel, which was nice. Not for the sandwiches, those were nasty. But they had a nice supply of Diet Coke, which is hard to come by that far away from the center and I bought their entire supply.

We had a good time working wtih the Chinese auditors. They were very nice and took us to dinner every night. We enjoyed a Hot Pot dinner the first night. They bring a huge pot of boiling water with herbs and spices and you dip raw meat and vegetables and then put it in a dip. It was darn tastey. The dip was really good and the CFO, bought a bunch of lamb, which I think is pretty rare and expensive in China. She also learned that we had not had Peking Duck, and ordered one. It was not good. The Chinese girls didn't even eat any.

The next night we ate at a Japanese place and it was an amazing meal. It was actually Korean and Japanese. They dropped the hot charcoal into the table and then brought out tons of meat and vegetables (reoccuring theme?) only this time the servers would cook the food for us. Again the sauce was amazing. We had some susi. My compadre, Mark, had never tried any. We all ate some with the fresh Wasabi they provided. We all nearly choked to death on the wasabi. It wasn't a matter of heat. I can handle all the heat you can dish out. This stuff made it impossible to BREATH. The fumes coming off this stuff made it impossible to breath from mouth and nose. I had to spit it out. It was embarassing that the girls handled it and I couldn't.

The next night we went to Subway and, as I said, not that great. It was nice to get in and out in short time. Dinner in China is a 2-3 hour event. Which gets frustrating when you are trying to get work done.

One night I noticed a shop "Blind Massage Therapy". I insisted on going and found a shop of blind massuers and massueses that only charged $11 for a one hour massage. Mark and I stripped down to the waste and let them at us. It was nice.

The auditors finished up on Friday and we weren't leaving until Sunday, so we decided to go see the Great Wall. After our disaster in the Forbidden City, the CFO insisted on sending us with two auditors and the company driver to make sure we didn't get lost or killed or robbed. The day was beautiful and sunny, but quite cold and windy. Waiting in line to get the tickets nearly killed us. Luckily there were people hocking their goods to the tourists and I was able to get a scarf and hat. Once on the wall, the ramparts actually cut the wind and the 50 degree inclines made the hiking difficult enough that I got quite warm.

I will put some picture of the great wall on the gallery for you enjoyment. It was staggering how big the structure was. It was basically a castle wall that extended up impossible hills and mountains over miles and miles. Every quarter mile or so, there was a guard station with windows and rooms and usually stairs up to the roof and sometimes stairs down to the ground. It was cool to see the walls and the barracks and the defensible wall. The crazy thing is the location of the wall, at least where we were. It must have been tough to build that wall on such steep hills.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

dyspeptic old woman

But savages are strange beings; at times you do not know exactly how to take them. At first they are overawing; their calm self-collectedness of simplicity seems a Socratic wisdom. I had noticed also that Queequeg never consorted at all, or but very little, with the other seamen in the inn. He made no advances whatever; appeared to have no desire to enlarge the circle of his acquaintances. All this struck me as mighty singular; yet, upon second thoughts, there was something almost sublime in it. Here was a man some twenty thousand miles from home, by the way of Cape Horn, that is - which was the only way he could get there - thrown among people as strange to him as though he were in the planet Jupiter; and yet he seemed entirely at his ease; preserving the utmost serenity; content with his own companionship; always equal to himself. Surely this was a touch of fine philosophy; though no doubt he had never heard there was such a thing as that. But, perhaps, to be true philosophers, we mortals should not be conscious of so living or so striving. So soon as I hear that such or such a man gives himself out for a philosopher, I conclude that, like the dyspeptic old woman, he must have "broken his digester."

Herman Melville - Moby Dick

Sunday, February 18, 2007

China #1

This trip to China started Friday, January 26 and started at 4am. When that day was over, I will have spent 22 hours in airport and on airplanes, flown over Alaska on the way to Tokyo and then on to Beijing and crossed a date line which put us in Beijing at 10pm on Saturday night.

I was able to sleep through most of the travel with the help of Diphenhydramine and some Ambien. I find the flying relaxing and easy. I rarely get to sit there and do nothing and sleep and watch movies. I recommend the Airbus when flying long distance. Individual tv screens with dozens of movies makes it really easy.

Since Sunday was our first day, we didn't work. We decided we would try and go see the Forbidden City which was in downtown. We were in a hotel on the outskirts of the city (past the 5th ring road; Beijing is organized in rings as it has continuely grown over the centuries. The 5th ring road takes nearly an hour to get to from the center.)

When we arrived, we were surrounded by rikshaw bike riders. The taxi driver shook his head and indicated we shouldn't take a ride. I figured it was because it was a rip off. I had no idea. So we stepped out and I finally asked how much a ride was. "Two" was teh answer. "Two yuan?" I asked which was about 20 cents. The guy said yes. So we climbed on. I was with a colleague from work, a staff auditor who is a little younger than me and had never been to China.

The promise was a ride around the Forbidden City, but ended up being down a back alley of run down, old houses. I kept asking, "Why are we going this way?" The answer was, "Old building, good picture, you be happy!" followed by a call on the cell phone. Yep, sure enough. The alley lead finally to a friend of there's who stepped out and backed up their collection of their fee. They held out their price card, Y300 or roughly $44.... each. Not knowing if the wingman had a knife or was some kind of kung fu expert, I got a little nervous. We argued a bit, nose to nose. I ended up giving them 200 each, figuring it was worth the cost to not get hurt and be able to tell one hell of a story when I got home. I like to tell myself that they had children at home that really needed the money. But in reality, I still daydream about just punching them in the nose and running.

So, feeling really stupid and slightly poorer, we walked the rest of the way to the Forbidden City. Entrance was pretty cheap, about $5. There were a bunch of Chinese there offering a guided tour, but we weren't trusting anyone at this point and thought their Y150 price tag as a little steep. So we went in on our own. It was a cold day and we didn't want to spend 4 hours, so we didn't even rent the Y40 guided tape.

We did run into a college student who did explain some of the symbolism of the name, right before he told us about a "New" section of the City, which was open because many of the buildings were being renovated for the Olympics. We went to this area, which turned out to be pretty boring, except for a new museum and a little shop where the college student was selling art and calligraphy and stone stamps with personalized names. We ended up getting stamps and felt a little used and ripped off, and continued on poorer and a little more leery of the Chinese people.

The City was awesome. Back in my kung fu, Chinese is cool era, at age 15, it would have been amazing to be there. I was able to tap into a little of that old passion, but not much. It was basically a bunch of old buildings. A LOT of old buildings. The city is a kilometer long and about half of one wide. It has hundreds of buildings that took care of every need of the Emperor and his thousands of servants.

We ended up later in the trop eating an Emperor's 15 course meal. More on that later. We ended the day eating a bucket of Cup o'noodle and drinking Coke Light (the word "Diet" doesn't really translate well. It makes it sound like you ONLY drink Sugar Free Coke -which we basically did- and happened to be the only Chinese I learned while there: "Tiang Yi Ka Co Ka La". It became an mission, an obsession, a purpose, a way of life, the search for Coke Light. One well worth all the effort.

On our way back to where we knew taxis to be waiting, two Chinese girls approached us asking if we spoke English, asked us where we were from, etc. They started walking with us on our way from the Forbidden City to Tianamen Square. At the same time, hordes of people started selling us hats and scarfs and other crap. The temperature had just dropped, so I was actually glad for the hat, which said Beijing Olympics 2008. It cost me about $1.30. As we walked, Shirley, one of the girls talked me up, told me I looked like Tom Cruise and made me feel like I was about get robbed again. The other girl had cornered my compadre and was talking him up as well. Finally they asked us to walk with them a mile way to some old street where there was an ancient tea ceremony going on....

I just stopped and stared at them. Looked around. Not sure what to say and finally said, "I think we'll go to KFC." She saw my hesitation and quickly said, "Oh, i'm sorry, I didn't mean to impose. I just thought we could talk, I like practicing English and I thought you would want to see some interesting things in Beijing. Bye." and grabbed her friends arm and hurried off. I stood there feeling really stupid, like I had offended a nice person and missed out on an opportunity to see some cool stuff, but ultimately didn't want to chance being lead down yet ANOTHER alley where her brothers and uncles were waiting to take more money away from a dumb American.

We ate a nasty abomination of a chicken sandwhich at KFC and went back to the hotel.


Monday, January 22, 2007

Dream House - by Orson Scott Card

My wife and I have always had better taste in houses than we could afford -- but then, who doesn't? Still, we had a dream house in mind, a Queen Anne style frame house with a turret and steep gables, porches all around, clapboard siding, surrounded by old trees. Inside there would be wonderful, one-of-a-kind rooms with amazing little nooks and crannies to thrill the heart of any child, and the eye of anyone who loves proud houses that have secrets.

The day arrived when we realized we could finally afford to build that house.

We had already been through the tumultuous decision not to move closer to my teaching job in Virginia -- we realized, to our surprise, that after twenty-three years even I, the man with the wandering foot, had accidentally put down roots here in Greensboro.

But the house we're in is, well, boring. We like the federal style well enough, but such houses are so ... so rectangular. And brick. Brick is fine. But it's so solid. It really didn't feel like us to us. We've spent fifteen years bumping into the walls of this federal-style brick house, which is missing a couple of rooms that we really need.

Also, this is a house that was built by a local builder that knew how to put up something that looked grand, but didn't care about getting the details right. So there are tiny annoyances, like corners that don't meet right, and sloppy workmanship and faulty planning -- and some that weren't so tiny, like the fact that the house was built on a bog and yet fifteen years later we had to have a drainage system installed around the house so it didn't float and sag and split any more than it already had.

We have gone to a lot of Parade of Homes shows in town, looking for a builder who cares about the details, but we gradually came to realize that most of the builders we saw were best at putting up a house in a hurry, and most of their "nice touches" were whatever had already been a fad in the DC or Atlanta area five years ago. Where was the builder who had his own eye for real grace in a house? More to the point, where was the builder who cared about quality even where people wouldn't notice it till they'd lived in a house for a year or so?

This past summer, we found that builder. His name is Scott Stalker, and his company is Stonefield Homes. We discovered him because we went to visit the new Hartman Farms development on Archergate, which connects Church Street and Yanceyville Road on the other side of Lake Townsend.

There were gorgeous wooded lots, but what took our breath away were the houses. Two builders are partnered in this development, and both do good work, but the one whose houses blew us away was Stonefield Homes. The interiors of the houses were full of light. Transoms over the interior doors had an amazing brightening effect. I looked at precisely the kind of detail work that was sloppily done in our present home, and there were no mistakes. We also looked at a house under construction and saw that nobody was cutting corners, at least not in the ways I've been (sadly) trained to look for. Someone cared.

We picked our lot. We put money down to hold it. My wife went online and found several designs, but there was one that was so close to what we wanted that we could hardly believe it. We bought the full set of plans, and then sat down with Scott Stalker and a designer he often works with, Patricia McLemore of On Eagle's Wings Design and Drafting Services. Scott told us that Patricia was the right designer to help us make the changes we needed in the plans, and he was right.

We talked to them about what each room was for, and what we hoped for. There was an attic space that we wanted to use. We knew that much of it was needed for mechanical things in the house, but we still wanted the space broken up into many levels, to be the ideal play room and sleepover room and pillowfight room. There was a bedroom with a turret -- we wanted the ceiling broken open and a cone-shaped loft space made available, so a hanging chair could dangle in the middle and be our daughter's ideal spot for computer games.

We talked about the movie-viewing space in the basement, the office and library space we need (because books threaten to crowd us out of our present house at any moment). Patricia McLemore caught the vision better than we did ourselves -- what she brought us was better than our dreams.

But a funny thing happened just two days before the meeting where they showed us the plans.

I had caught bacterial pneumonia three weeks earlier, and was still in the realm of the coughing dead. My wife has only finally come back fully from her stress-related heart attack of last fall. I had also just turned fifty-five. Maybe it was the combination of these things, showing us that we were not young anymore. Maybe it was just realizing that we were really going to do this.

But it dawned on both of us, quite separately, that we were about to build the wrong dream house. We were shy about saying it to each other, because up to that moment we had both been so excited. Here's what we realized:

We were preparing to build the house we wish we had raised our children in.

All those marvelous spaces -- how I wish we'd had them when our two oldest were still little. Oh, the memories they would have!

But we didn't have that house then. Instead, we lived in a spacious condo in Guilford Colony that we rented from the most patient and generous landlord in the world. Seven years we were there, when our oldest kids were little. Then we moved to our present house just as they moved into their teens. And this is the only house that our youngest has ever lived in. Most of our older kids' memories, and all of our youngest's, are here.

The new house we were about to build, beautiful as it was, perfect as it was, would not feel like coming home to them when they brought the grandkids to visit us over the years.

More to the point, it wouldn't feel like coming home to us, either. Not really.

Because the house we're in is the one where I can walk into any room and see, in memory, the younger versions of my children. Now our family room is dominated by a big screen tv. But I can walk in there and see the waterbed where our handicapped son used to sleep, and picture our youngest as a three-year-old, bringing books down to sit on the bed beside him and "read" to him.

Our living room has seen fifteen Christmases; our country kitchen has seen fifteen Thanksgivings with various collections of friends and family gathered there.

Our music room (which in other people's houses would have been a dining room) shows me memories of my kids playing the piano, my oldest daughter singing as she first took lessons and realized she was a soprano and could soar, my oldest son playing a favorite song from memory.

In the library (a bedroom where the closets became computer carrels and the floor is covered with islands of bookshelves) -- I can see our oldest son, now a game designer, playing intensely at the newest computer game when he was in high school and all his game-playing was stolen from homework time. I can see our older daughter when she would write scraps of stories and then walk away, stories that were so funny my wife and I would print them out whenever we found them, and read them to each other.

Our new house was going to have a bigger, better version of all these rooms. But there wouldn't be any of the memories in it.

What's the point, at age fifty-five, of taking on a mortgage that won't be paid off till I'm in my eighties, in order to have a house that is beautiful and big but has no memories of when our children were young and still intensely involved in the family's life?

The house we're in is still smaller than we need. There are still little annoyances and some big things that must be changed. So we'll change them.

The house that Patricia planned for us and that Scott Stalker would have made so beautiful and strong -- how I wish it could exist. But Scott will build great houses and Patricia will design wonderful spaces for other people -- and we'll be happy just knowing that there are people who still care about creating homes that are so gracious and sturdy. Someone else will buy that perfect lot in Hartman Farms. (We promise not to drive by and sigh too often.)

We'll keep puttering about in a house that was never what we wanted -- we bought it because it was big enough and it was all we could afford at the time we needed it. But it's the house where our third child lived the last nine years of his life, where our grown-up children lived when they started dating and went to proms, where our youngest has spent her entire life. When they come visit us, they'll be coming home.

That's a kind of dream house, too, isn't it?